Which Truth Is True?

There are many interesting contrasts to be found in history. By putting two personalities side by side and comparing their lives, one often gains valuable insights and lessons. Consider two famous reformers whose lives overlapped; Mohandas Ghandi (1869-1948) and American Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957).

For those who may not be aware of their stories, Mohandas Ghandi was an Indian lawyer who fought for civil rights for Indians in South Africa and then later was one of the leaders of the movement to achieve the independence of India from British rule.

Senator Joseph McCarthy was also a lawyer who became a Republican senator in the USA from 1947-1957, the post-war period when communist Russia was growing in power and spreading its influence around the world. Many in the USA felt as threatened by communism as they do today by Muslim extremists and terrorists. This led to the “Cold War”, in which no actual fighting took place between Russia and America, but a tense state of rivalry existed continuously. McCarthy was at the forefront of the movement to keep communism out of America.

These two men tried to change their societies for the better, or at least what they each saw as being better. Ghandi saw the injustice of South African racism and fought to create fairness and equality between whites, blacks and Indians. He saw how Imperial Britain was plundering his native land India for its own selfish purposes and fought for the freedom of his people. McCarthy saw a great threat from Communism in America and fought to stop its ideas spreading in the nation built upon democracy, individual ambition and the free market.

But where Ghandi often looked for the good in others and within himself, McCarthy saw evil where it did not exist. While Ghandi had a very strong grip on reality, McCarthy believed and acted upon falsehoods. For Ghandi, truth was paramount. He refused to take advantage from anything that was false, no matter how much it might benefit his cause and advance his goals. He went so far as to identify God with Truth, a very Christian concept! With this attitude, it is no wonder that he was brutally truthful with himself, weeding out his own failings and inconsistencies constantly and thus treating others with a deep and genuine humility. Perhaps it was because he set such a high standard of truth for his own inner life that he was able to tell the difference between truth and falsehood so easily in his external life.

McCarthy on the other hand took the opposite view. In order to achieve his goals, he was willing to arrogantly throw unsubstantiated accusations at people left right and centre, thus stirring up mass hysteria. While some of his allegations turned out to be true, time has shown that most of them were exaggerated or totally false. He was in fact, a skilled exponent of the “Conspiracy Theory”. This is a well known phenomenon in modern society (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory). Its common features include allegations of secret plots, usually carried out by shady characters who appear innocent but have great hidden power or influence. The problem with conspiracy theories is that they are very hard to discredit. When anyone points out the obvious mistakes in them, they are immediately painted as being part of the conspiracy! McCarthy accused even many of his fellow politicians as being closet communists, which no doubt contributed to his own eventual self-destruction.

Another stark difference is evident in the tactics and ethics of the two reformers. On one occasion, as Ghandi was a leading a major protest against the British, he insisted that the protest be halted over the Christmas break. He would not take the Christian police and security guards away from their families on a day he knew to be very precious and special for them, even though he himself was Hindu and not Christian.
On the other hand, we find McCarthy willing to bully and threaten, abusing his position as a senator throwing wild allegations around that tarnished the name of many good people and organisations unnecessarily. He seems to have felt no compassion for the many lives he damaged, for the innocent wives and children of those he wrongly accused of being communist.

Both Ghandi and McCarthy had enemies who opposed them and did their best to discredit them. But again, it is interesting to note the character of their respective enemies. Ghandi’s enemies used smear and innuendo together with unjust imperial power to try to stop him. McCarthy’s enemies were not opposed to his goals, but rather to his tactics, and used the legitimate power of the senate and common sense arguments to censure him and stop his irrational witch hunt.

Both men suffered for their efforts. Ghandi spent a number of years in jail throughout his campaigns, a situation he accepted with calmness and dignity. Nor did he allow this painful experience to weaken his commitment to his noble goals, nor to embitter his feelings. In a most Christ-like display of forgiveness, he held nothing against his enemies and treated them always with dignity and respect. Through this patient and confident strength, he overcame his enemies. He was an example to his countrymen, an example that was probably the biggest factor in the fact that independence came to India peacefully, rather than with a bloody war of independence. In the end, he was assassinated: the man who fought for peace and non-violence all his life died by violence. But his legacy lives on until today. India celebrates his birthday as a public holiday, and it is also International Day of Non-Violence.

With time, the rational majority in the USA began to feel uncomfortable with McCarthy’s fanaticism and his conspiracy theories. Courageous senators began to stand up against him and openly challenge his tactics, thus running the risk of being accused of being communists or communist sympathisers themselves. But in the end, sanity prevailed, and in 1954 the American Senate censured McCarthy; a rare dishonour. This broke his power and effectively put an end to his policies. From that time on, he was shunned by other senators who would leave the chamber when he spoke, or blatantly turn their backs to him and ignore him. His public popularity waned, and he died three years later, most likely from alcohol-induced liver failure.

One would imagine that Ghandi died with a sense of peace, having maintained his integrity all his life, and having lived and died for the principles he believed in so strongly. McCarthy on the other hand, appears to have fallen into alcoholism during his later years and died a broken man.

Perhaps this contrast can teach us much about life. It is not enough to have noble goals. The way we go about achieving our goals is often just as important as the goals themselves. “The end does not justify the means”, the famous proverb says, and McCarthy’s life is an ample illustration of the truth of that saying.

Devotion to Truth is another of the major lessons I see here. Ghandi’s insistence upon truth and his unwillingness to accept or use innuendo, allegations or gossip to his own advantage raised him above his enemies and many of his fellow reformers. McCarthy’s crass self-serving methods discredited him and lost him the respect of his fellow Americans, so that “McCarthysim” has passed into the English language as a most derogatory term. Sadly, he might have been a hero of history had he used more ethical methods. The difference was Truth. Both of them claimed to be telling the truth, but only one of them really was.

For a brief summary of their lives, the interested reader will find Wikipedia useful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghandi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_McCarthy

I have not yet read a good biography of Joe McCarthy, but I can highly recommend Ghandi’s autobiography; “The Story of My Experiments with Truth”.

Fr Ant

No votes yet.
Please wait...
Voting is currently disabled, data maintenance in progress.

4 Replies to “Which Truth Is True?”

  1. Dear Father Ant,

    Thanks for a great blog.

    I have read Louis Fischer’s “The Life of Mahatma Gandhi” and found it also to be very good. The book inspired Sir Richard Attenborough to make his film “Gandhi.” Although it is a long read, Fischer manages to keep you engaged all the way through.

    My favourite quotes of Gandhi’s are:

    “God, as Truth, has been for me a treasure beyond price. May He be so to every one of us.”

    “You must be the change you want to see in the world.”

    “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”

    “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.”

    PPFM,

    Mary 🙂

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    Voting is currently disabled, data maintenance in progress.
  2. ummm…

    Which Truth is true?…not Gandhi’s…

    I mean, really???

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    Voting is currently disabled, data maintenance in progress.
  3. it is true that popular idiomatic expression and as we use it all the time as well in the Arab world and that “THE GOAL JUSTIFY THE MEAN “!!??as far as the aim is achieved it does not matter how and what even if we break necks in it ??!!it is applicable all the time as part of the way of life in most of those non democratic countries with no respect to any human rights and with no dignity to the human being at the end of the day ??! Ghandi was one of the greatest leaders who lived in our recent history and forgive me father no comparison with that politician who li9ke any politician just covered his seat at that time as like any other politicians parasites ??!! sometimes people confuse between the chracteristics of a leader and that of the manager such common politicians

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    Voting is currently disabled, data maintenance in progress.
  4. it is true that popular idiomatic expression and as we use it all the time as well in the Arab world and that “THE GOAL JUSTIFY THE MEAN “!!??as far as the aim is achieved it does not matter how and what even if we break necks in it ??!!it is applicable all the time as part of the way of life in most of those non democratic countries with no respect to any human rights and with no dignity to the human being at the end of the day ??! Ghandi was one of the greatest leaders who lived in our recent history with great ideology and forgive me father no comparison with that politician who like any politician just covered his seat at that time as no better than any other politicians with different policies ,acts and pieces of legislations ??!! ??!! sometimes people confuse between the characteristics of a leader and that of the manager “such common politicians “??!! the characteristics of the leader “including spiritual leaders” are the following , planing , mission ,motivation ,delegation through the right people and right Chanel , use the right means ,caring , negotiation ,active listener , problem solver ,ability in conflict resolution ,team player , maximize the loyalty of own team , treat own team and others with respect and dignity ,openness , transparency , patience ,achieve things through own team ,recognition of efforts , analytical ability ,efficiency , effectiveness , responsibility and accountability at the end of the day .. if we look at our wonderful leader and councilor Jesus Christ we find all these great characteristics who applied it on the people with his disciples and even with his enemies He used to go the extra mile with them. with his great LOVE and FORGIVENESS …… ” ..this FORGIVENESS is used to day as the BACKBONE of Christian counseling as the secular counseling and its theories are not effective by itself to fulfill that emptiness and lack of peace inside the human soul .. so it is used all the time today by most of the clinical psychologists and councilors in their therapeutic procedures … our wonderful and great leader Jesus Christ talked and applied all those great values in his great ideology the bible 2000 years ago and still going on till thy kingdom come , it is amazing …praise God by our life ….forgive me i pressed the wrong button on the previous message before it finished !!? i believe it is part of the aging process , oh my God how we stop it ???!!might be the stem cells do something in the next few years ,God knows , certainly life will be different with a lot of challenges , that is life !!!??

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
    Voting is currently disabled, data maintenance in progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*