<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Like Coptic.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:49:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="717055044">Facebook User</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="717055044">Facebook User</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning e-sword. It is a pretty interesting software. Was wondering if there is any &quot;Commentary&quot; that is Orthodox, that we can utilise with it? I think at Shenouda&#039;s Monastery, Abouna Anthony had some stuff for the New Testament on his e-sword?

GB!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning e-sword. It is a pretty interesting software. Was wondering if there is any &#8220;Commentary&#8221; that is Orthodox, that we can utilise with it? I think at Shenouda&#8217;s Monastery, Abouna Anthony had some stuff for the New Testament on his e-sword?</p>
<p>GB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romani Sergyos</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Romani Sergyos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Mina , George and anonymous,it is great to hear your   honest straightforward views ... it might be a message for me from God ....  please do not get me wrong , somebody has to be the bad bloke and point the finger at the problems  , hoping things move in the right direction for our community   .....  for years now , we were  hoping  church committees do their work in this area  but i believe they  learned to agree all the time or could be joined the apathy group as well ???!!  God knows , too much ????!!.... anyhow it is not an easy task  for anybody  or committee to point the finger constructively  and get the message across and get  the work done  .... !!!?   back to our issue , first it is good to see  involvement and that the blog nourish with different  constructive views and the most important above all it  is a healthy sign that a lot started to break  the ice and that zone of lack of interest and at the end of the day who wants to improve  will improve, every day we learn ...  .. ...we can not deny that  every where all communities and societies starve all the time  for improvement to achieve  the best  of the best and it does not matter the background or education or age or sex or whatever  for its members  as  always there is a room for improvement for all  , so do you think our church came from vacuum with all those courses and lectures  of awareness and education such as  bible studies ,Christian Counseling , couple marriage education , middle age crisis , drugs , specialist people go and come and talk about relationships , domestic violence ,  high rate of divorces , separations ,specialist gambling  and you name it such a lot of crisis and attitudinal problems  .. so give it a thought , those front liners priests and those positive and honest people working behind the scenes and all those people volunteering their effort and  time  ,they know what they are doing in this specific  area and i believe they have their own statistics, figures and plans   ..  i believe it is great and all of us as a community has a role to play  and encourage those positive and constructive approach !!! second our culture is very ignorant in positive relationships , positive attitude  &quot;including myself at this age &quot;at all levels and at different ages and in different areas in our life ..our church is strengthening those  weakness hoping to prevent a lot of  future problems which is great to have a healthy and happy  community with less problems  ...still a lot of areas in our church needs a lot of attention and hard work ... we rely on you young blokes  and your positive involvement to do something ...may our lord Jesus Christ guide us all to play our role  and do our bit in  our church community as real  responsible and accountable Christians....i feel i can not give and take any more in this  great  blog ...cheers ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mina , George and anonymous,it is great to hear your   honest straightforward views &#8230; it might be a message for me from God &#8230;.  please do not get me wrong , somebody has to be the bad bloke and point the finger at the problems  , hoping things move in the right direction for our community   &#8230;..  for years now , we were  hoping  church committees do their work in this area  but i believe they  learned to agree all the time or could be joined the apathy group as well ???!!  God knows , too much ????!!&#8230;. anyhow it is not an easy task  for anybody  or committee to point the finger constructively  and get the message across and get  the work done  &#8230;. !!!?   back to our issue , first it is good to see  involvement and that the blog nourish with different  constructive views and the most important above all it  is a healthy sign that a lot started to break  the ice and that zone of lack of interest and at the end of the day who wants to improve  will improve, every day we learn &#8230;  .. &#8230;we can not deny that  every where all communities and societies starve all the time  for improvement to achieve  the best  of the best and it does not matter the background or education or age or sex or whatever  for its members  as  always there is a room for improvement for all  , so do you think our church came from vacuum with all those courses and lectures  of awareness and education such as  bible studies ,Christian Counseling , couple marriage education , middle age crisis , drugs , specialist people go and come and talk about relationships , domestic violence ,  high rate of divorces , separations ,specialist gambling  and you name it such a lot of crisis and attitudinal problems  .. so give it a thought , those front liners priests and those positive and honest people working behind the scenes and all those people volunteering their effort and  time  ,they know what they are doing in this specific  area and i believe they have their own statistics, figures and plans   ..  i believe it is great and all of us as a community has a role to play  and encourage those positive and constructive approach !!! second our culture is very ignorant in positive relationships , positive attitude  &#8220;including myself at this age &#8220;at all levels and at different ages and in different areas in our life ..our church is strengthening those  weakness hoping to prevent a lot of  future problems which is great to have a healthy and happy  community with less problems  &#8230;still a lot of areas in our church needs a lot of attention and hard work &#8230; we rely on you young blokes  and your positive involvement to do something &#8230;may our lord Jesus Christ guide us all to play our role  and do our bit in  our church community as real  responsible and accountable Christians&#8230;.i feel i can not give and take any more in this  great  blog &#8230;cheers &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Romani, there were many books used by the different Churches before 325 AD which are not found in the Bible today. Sts Paul and Peter and John had supposedly written other epistles which were read, and Apostles like St Barnabus had also supposedly written an epistle which was commonly read in the Churches and is referred to in the writings of Fathers like Athanasius.
St Paul had supposedly also written his own version of his own heavenly Revelation. Then we have the Gnostic Gospel, which although unpopular and the cause of some contraversy, were also being circulated and copies of which have even been unearthed in monasteries like St Catherine&#039;s in Sinai.
At the first Ecumenical Council, the Church decided that it was going to deem canonical a set of these books to be used by all dioceses, and the books which today make up the Bible, as well as those books known as the Deuterocanonical books were deemed Scripture.

The Church was established at Penetcost, before any of these books were written. The Gosepls and the Epistles were written in the years up to about 100 AD, when the Church had already been established.

Jesus established the Church, not the Bible. The Bible is the Church&#039;s gift to the world, and not the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romani, there were many books used by the different Churches before 325 AD which are not found in the Bible today. Sts Paul and Peter and John had supposedly written other epistles which were read, and Apostles like St Barnabus had also supposedly written an epistle which was commonly read in the Churches and is referred to in the writings of Fathers like Athanasius.<br />
St Paul had supposedly also written his own version of his own heavenly Revelation. Then we have the Gnostic Gospel, which although unpopular and the cause of some contraversy, were also being circulated and copies of which have even been unearthed in monasteries like St Catherine&#8217;s in Sinai.<br />
At the first Ecumenical Council, the Church decided that it was going to deem canonical a set of these books to be used by all dioceses, and the books which today make up the Bible, as well as those books known as the Deuterocanonical books were deemed Scripture.</p>
<p>The Church was established at Penetcost, before any of these books were written. The Gosepls and the Epistles were written in the years up to about 100 AD, when the Church had already been established.</p>
<p>Jesus established the Church, not the Bible. The Bible is the Church&#8217;s gift to the world, and not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romani Sergyos</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Romani Sergyos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Nathan  thanks for this great valuable feed back information ..just i wonder what type of books used during the first 325 years of Christianity , i mean in that period before the  official gatherings  of the bible ???!!  i wonder when our lord preached the good new with his disciples passed on the good news   and then disciples  received the holy spirit and the good news kept going all over the place  , i believe all the information of the bible kept  passing  verbally from generation to generation till gathered in the bible ...so the bottom line those preachings passed verbally before establishing the church and when then the  church established on those gathered  guide lines of the bible  ... those are my thoughts , i wonder if i am in the right track ???! so we come back to the way around  that the church is the product of the bible ??? mate it is a bit confusing ???!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan  thanks for this great valuable feed back information ..just i wonder what type of books used during the first 325 years of Christianity , i mean in that period before the  official gatherings  of the bible ???!!  i wonder when our lord preached the good new with his disciples passed on the good news   and then disciples  received the holy spirit and the good news kept going all over the place  , i believe all the information of the bible kept  passing  verbally from generation to generation till gathered in the bible &#8230;so the bottom line those preachings passed verbally before establishing the church and when then the  church established on those gathered  guide lines of the bible  &#8230; those are my thoughts , i wonder if i am in the right track ???! so we come back to the way around  that the church is the product of the bible ??? mate it is a bit confusing ???!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>I seem to again be the cause of a topic veering off course...anyway...

The view that the Bible is the sole authority is what brought on the Protestant Reformation. 
We do source our Christian values from the Gospels and Epistles to be sure, but the Church produced the Bible, not the other way around. The Church existed for 325 years before the Bible as we know it came into existance. Before that time, there were different books and scrolls being read and circulated throughtout different Churches. It wasn&#039;t until 325 AD at Nicea that the Univeral Church decided to have all Churches using the same texts, and the Bible as we know it was compiled with those texts which were deemed divinely inspired.
If the Church is the product of the Bible, then we should, as do the Muslims of their Koran; believe that the Bible descended from heaven as it is and that the Church was built around it. We know that is not the case. We know the Bible was written by different persons who were inspired by God to write the words they did. 
The Bible is therefore a product of a Church which had already existed, compiled from different writings of different men who tried to explain or retell the Christian faith. Who knows, maybe someday in future another book may be written or discovered which will be deemed by an Ecumenical Council as Scripture, although I doubt that will ever be the case.

Anyway...that&#039;s enough from me, I&#039;m going back to the topic....I LIKE COPTIC....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to again be the cause of a topic veering off course&#8230;anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>The view that the Bible is the sole authority is what brought on the Protestant Reformation.<br />
We do source our Christian values from the Gospels and Epistles to be sure, but the Church produced the Bible, not the other way around. The Church existed for 325 years before the Bible as we know it came into existance. Before that time, there were different books and scrolls being read and circulated throughtout different Churches. It wasn&#8217;t until 325 AD at Nicea that the Univeral Church decided to have all Churches using the same texts, and the Bible as we know it was compiled with those texts which were deemed divinely inspired.<br />
If the Church is the product of the Bible, then we should, as do the Muslims of their Koran; believe that the Bible descended from heaven as it is and that the Church was built around it. We know that is not the case. We know the Bible was written by different persons who were inspired by God to write the words they did.<br />
The Bible is therefore a product of a Church which had already existed, compiled from different writings of different men who tried to explain or retell the Christian faith. Who knows, maybe someday in future another book may be written or discovered which will be deemed by an Ecumenical Council as Scripture, although I doubt that will ever be the case.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;that&#8217;s enough from me, I&#8217;m going back to the topic&#8230;.I LIKE COPTIC&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romani Sergyos</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Romani Sergyos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Mate Nathan what you wrote  is great  as our  christian way of life and all those great fruits of the holy spirit are from   all those  great christian values which we got from the bible and as well   what passed by hand from our holy fathers over the years ..... just that point that  church is not based on the bible is not clear for me  however   i believe our main guide lines in our christian way of life based entirely  on the bible and its great values and promises ...i believe the church is one of the products  of the bible with all its sacraments &quot; the good news &quot; the life of company  with its head our lord Christ and all of us the members in that holy  body ...  i believe the bible teaches us every thing  A to Z in the right and  the wrong  in our way of life ...i hope  somebody else might share  with  own view and experience  so we can learn more ... every day we learn something ...God bless ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mate Nathan what you wrote  is great  as our  christian way of life and all those great fruits of the holy spirit are from   all those  great christian values which we got from the bible and as well   what passed by hand from our holy fathers over the years &#8230;.. just that point that  church is not based on the bible is not clear for me  however   i believe our main guide lines in our christian way of life based entirely  on the bible and its great values and promises &#8230;i believe the church is one of the products  of the bible with all its sacraments &#8221; the good news &#8221; the life of company  with its head our lord Christ and all of us the members in that holy  body &#8230;  i believe the bible teaches us every thing  A to Z in the right and  the wrong  in our way of life &#8230;i hope  somebody else might share  with  own view and experience  so we can learn more &#8230; every day we learn something &#8230;God bless &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Romani, following Christ because of his great ideals and values is not a valid reason because if you search you will find many religious figures, and many religions with the same ideals and values which we take for granted as being exclusively Christian.
You follow Christ because you have been given a grace to believe, a grace without which Christianity would perhaps seem foolish. This grace is available, but you only have genuinely want it or search for it. For those of us baptised and given this grace as children it is often taken for granted, but it is there.

There is a common misunderstanding among Orthodox Christians that the Bible is the be-all-and-end-all of the Christian faith.
The Church is not based on the Bible; the Bible is a product of the Church, produced by the Churches Apostles and Prophets. Divinely inspired, to be sure, but it is not the only thing through which the Church bases its teaching and doctrine. The Church relies not only on the Bible, but also the Holy Tradition and the Holy Fathers which were also divinely inspired and instrumental in establishing Christian doctrine.

Anyway, that&#039;s off topic.
I too like Coptic!! I don&#039;t understand it, I can&#039;t read it, write it or speak it. But I love hearing it spoken!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romani, following Christ because of his great ideals and values is not a valid reason because if you search you will find many religious figures, and many religions with the same ideals and values which we take for granted as being exclusively Christian.<br />
You follow Christ because you have been given a grace to believe, a grace without which Christianity would perhaps seem foolish. This grace is available, but you only have genuinely want it or search for it. For those of us baptised and given this grace as children it is often taken for granted, but it is there.</p>
<p>There is a common misunderstanding among Orthodox Christians that the Bible is the be-all-and-end-all of the Christian faith.<br />
The Church is not based on the Bible; the Bible is a product of the Church, produced by the Churches Apostles and Prophets. Divinely inspired, to be sure, but it is not the only thing through which the Church bases its teaching and doctrine. The Church relies not only on the Bible, but also the Holy Tradition and the Holy Fathers which were also divinely inspired and instrumental in establishing Christian doctrine.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s off topic.<br />
I too like Coptic!! I don&#8217;t understand it, I can&#8217;t read it, write it or speak it. But I love hearing it spoken!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mina saidden</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>mina saidden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Copts don&#039;t show love or apreciation to one another??????
What kind of people have you been hanging around buddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copts don&#8217;t show love or apreciation to one another??????<br />
What kind of people have you been hanging around buddy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George S</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>George S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>&quot; i like Coptes because they do not express their feelings to one another of appreciations , thankfulness, love and care when the occasion requires that ???! i like coptes even between husbands and wives , they do not express their feelings of love and care even by simple words ” for this new couples who wants to merry please go and attend that great course intended for that by the church “???!! &quot;
Romani have you meet evry person and couple in the Coptic Orthodox Church to make such Improper alegations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; i like Coptes because they do not express their feelings to one another of appreciations , thankfulness, love and care when the occasion requires that ???! i like coptes even between husbands and wives , they do not express their feelings of love and care even by simple words ” for this new couples who wants to merry please go and attend that great course intended for that by the church “???!! &#8221;<br />
Romani have you meet evry person and couple in the Coptic Orthodox Church to make such Improper alegations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frantonios.org.au/2009/11/06/i-like-coptic/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>&quot;i like Coptes because they do not express their feelings to one another of appreciations , thankfulness, love and care when the occasion requires that ???! i like coptes even between husbands and wives , they do not express their feelings of love and care even by simple words ” for this new couples who wants to merry please go and attend that great course intended for that by the church “???!!...&quot;
I don&#039;t think Romani your in a position to sit there judging and pointing out other peoples errors. Have you meet every person and couple in the Coptic community to make such improper allegations?

&quot; i like coptes because it is a culture of winging and nagging all the time and i like them more when they talk all of them at the same time and nobody wants to try the listening sense which God gave it to them ??!! ...&quot;

You speak of Copts &quot;whinging and nagging &quot; and then you post  a whole  forum reply of whinging, nagging and questioning the duties of the priests and weither or not they are looking after their congregation.
I&#039;m sorry my friend but i think you are out of line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i like Coptes because they do not express their feelings to one another of appreciations , thankfulness, love and care when the occasion requires that ???! i like coptes even between husbands and wives , they do not express their feelings of love and care even by simple words ” for this new couples who wants to merry please go and attend that great course intended for that by the church “???!!&#8230;&#8221;<br />
I don&#8217;t think Romani your in a position to sit there judging and pointing out other peoples errors. Have you meet every person and couple in the Coptic community to make such improper allegations?</p>
<p>&#8221; i like coptes because it is a culture of winging and nagging all the time and i like them more when they talk all of them at the same time and nobody wants to try the listening sense which God gave it to them ??!! &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You speak of Copts &#8220;whinging and nagging &#8221; and then you post  a whole  forum reply of whinging, nagging and questioning the duties of the priests and weither or not they are looking after their congregation.<br />
I&#8217;m sorry my friend but i think you are out of line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
